image dons

je fais un don

Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial

Bourses ACTION 2025 - Candidatures ouvertes !
M2, thèse de sciences, mobilité aux USA, soins infirmiers, prix de thèse de médecine - Date limite de candidatures : 06 avril 2025

Colloquium "La cardiologie préventive : nouveautés" (mardi 1er avril 2025)
Réservez vos places !

European Heart Journal 2022 Aug 1;43(29):2783-2797
Article disponible en consultant le site

Auteurs

Collet JP, Van Belle E, Thiele H, Berti S, Lhermusier T, Manigold T, Neumann FJ, Gilard M, Attias D, Beygui F, Cequier A, Alfonso F, Aubry P, Baronnet F, Ederhy S, Kasty ME, Kerneis M, Barthelemy O, Lefèvre T, Leprince P, Redheuil A, Henry P, Portal JJ, Vicaut E, Montalescot G; ATLANTIS Investigators of the ACTION Group.

Abstract

Background

The respective roles of oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain debated.

Aims

ATLANTIS is an international, randomized, open-label, superiority trial comparing apixaban to the standard of care.

Methods

After successful TAVI, 1500 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive apixaban 5 mg (2.5 mg if impaired renal function or concomitant antiplatelet therapy) (n = 749) twice daily, or standard of care (n = 751). Randomization was stratified by the need for chronic anticoagulation therapy. Standard-of-care patients received a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (Stratum 1) or antiplatelet therapy (Stratum 2) if there was an indication for anticoagulation or not, respectively. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, systemic embolism, intracardiac or bioprosthesis thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding over 1-year follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was major, disabling, or life-threatening bleeding.

Results

The primary outcome occurred in 138 (18.4%) and 151 (20.1%) patients receiving apixaban or standard of care, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.16] and there was no evidence of interaction between treatment and stratum (Pinteraction = 0.57). The primary safety endpoint was similar in both groups (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.72-1.44). In Stratum 1 (n = 451), an exploratory analysis showed no difference for all endpoints between apixaban and VKA. In Stratum 2 (n = 1049), the primary outcome and primary safety endpoint did not differ, but obstructive valve thrombosis was reduced with apixaban vs. antiplatelet therapy (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.08-0.46), while a signal of higher non-cardiovascular mortality was observed with apixaban.

Conclusions

After TAVI, apixaban was not superior to the standard of care, irrespective of an indication for oral anticoagulation.

Autres actualités

+

01/10/2023


Rationale and design of the ARAMIS trial: Anakinra versus pl...

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Oct;116(10):460-466
+

01/09/2023


Comparison of three echo-guidance techniques in percutaneous...

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Sep 29:S1875-2136(23)00171-7