image dons

je fais un don

Pre-hospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the French ATLANTIC population

Bourses ACTION 2025 - Candidatures ouvertes !
M2, thèse de sciences, mobilité aux USA, soins infirmiers, prix de thèse de médecine - Date limite de candidatures : 06 avril 2025

Colloquium "La cardiologie préventive : nouveautés" (mardi 1er avril 2025)
Réservez vos places !

Publié dans International Journal of Cardiology 2017 Oct 1;244:49-53

Auteurs : Cayla G, Lapostolle F, Ecollan P, Stibbe O, Benezet JF, Henry P, Hammett CJ, Lassen JF, Storey RF, Ten Berg JM, Hamm CW, Van’t Hof AW, Montalescot G; ACTION study group.

Article disponible en consultant le site

Abstract

International Journal of Cardiology

Background and aim :

ATLANTIC was a randomized study comparing pre- and in-hospital treatment with a ticagrelor loading dose (LD) in ongoing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes in France with other countries participating in ATLANTIC.

Methods :

The population comprised 1862 patients, 660 (35.4%) from France and 1202 from 12 other countries. The main endpoints were reperfusion (≥70% ST-segment elevation resolution) and TIMI flow grade 3 before (co-primary endpoints) and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Other endpoints included a composite ischaemic endpoint (death/myocardial infarction/stroke/urgent revascularization/definite stent thrombosis) and bleeding events at 30days.

Results :

In France, median times from first LD to angiography and between first and second LDs were 49 and 35min, respectively, and were similar to other countries. French patients were younger (mean 58.7 vs 61.9years, p<0.0001) and characterized by a higher rate of radial access (89.9% vs 54.8%, p<0.0001), more frequent use of pre-hospital glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors (14.1% vs 3.1%, p<0.0001) and intravenous enoxaparin (57.3% vs 10.1%, p<0.0001). In France, as in other countries, the co-primary endpoints did not differ between the two randomization groups. The composite ischaemic endpoint was numerically lower in France (3.3% vs 5.1%, p=0.07), with a lower mortality (1.4% vs 3.3%, p=0.01). PLATO major bleeding was numerically less frequent in France (1.8% vs 3.2%, p=0.07).

Conclusion :

The French population appears to have better outcomes than the rest of the study population, and seems related to differences in demographics and management characteristics (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01347580)

+

01/10/2023


Rationale and design of the ARAMIS trial: Anakinra versus pl...

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Oct;116(10):460-466
+

01/09/2023


Comparison of three echo-guidance techniques in percutaneous...

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Sep 29:S1875-2136(23)00171-7