Auteurs
Guedeney P, Mesnier J, Zeitouni M, Hauguel-Moreau M, Silvain J, Houde C, Alperi A, Panagides V, Collet JP, Wallet T, Rouanet S, Hammoudi N, Rodés-Cabau J, Montalescot G; AIR-FORCE Task Force.
Abstract
Background
Randomised controlled trials evaluating percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) have included only patients with a recent embolic event.
Aims
We aimed to evaluate outcomes after percutaneous PFO closure according to the delay from the last embolic episode.
Methods
This international ambispective cohort included consecutive patients from 2 centres in France and Canada undergoing PFO closure for secondary prevention of a paradoxical embolic event. The primary end point was the composite of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). A logistic regression model was used to evaluate determinants of late PFO closure procedures.
Results
A total of 1179 patients (mean age 49 ± 12.7 years; 44.4% female) underwent PFO closure from 2001 to 2021. The median delay from last embolic event to procedure was 6.0 (interquartile range 3.4-11.2) months. The determinants of late PFO closure procedure were the centre (France vs Canada; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.19), year of procedure (since 2018 vs before 2018; aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08-1.90), female sex (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.28-2.07), and lower risk of paradoxical embolism score (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.19). After a median follow-up of 2.61 (1.13-7.25) years, the incidence rate of first stroke or TIA did not differ between early and late PFO procedures, with 0.51 vs 0.29 events per 100 patient-years, respectively (incidence rate ratio 1.74, 95% CI 0.66-5.08; P = 0.24), and the timing of PFO closure was not associated with the occurrence of stroke or TIA in univariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.22-1.34) for late vs early closure).
Conclusions
This analysis provides indirect evidence that the delay from the last ischemic event does not affect outcomes after PFO closure for secondary prevention.
